Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Case Report
Case Report, Infectious Diseases
Case Report, Nephrology
Case Series, Nephrology
Commentary
EDITORIAL BOARD 2026-2-2
Original Article, Urology and Renal Surgery
Original Research Article
Original Research Article, Endocrinology and Metabolism
Original Research Article, Nephrology
Perspectives and Opinions, Health Education
Prespective
Review Article
Review Article, Dialysis and Transplantation
Review Article, Nephrology
Review Article, Pediatric Nephrology
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts
Case Report
Case Report, Infectious Diseases
Case Report, Nephrology
Case Series, Nephrology
Commentary
EDITORIAL BOARD 2026-2-2
Original Article, Urology and Renal Surgery
Original Research Article
Original Research Article, Endocrinology and Metabolism
Original Research Article, Nephrology
Perspectives and Opinions, Health Education
Prespective
Review Article
Review Article, Dialysis and Transplantation
Review Article, Nephrology
Review Article, Pediatric Nephrology
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Research Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/WARM_11_2026

Primary care gaps in pediatric urinary tract infection management: Knowledge, attitudes, and reported practices among general practitioners in Muscat, Oman, and potential implications for renal outcomes

Department of Family Medicine, Directorate General of Health Services, Muscat, Oman.
Author image
Corresponding author: Alya Ali Abdullah AL Hasni, Department of Family Medicine, Directorate General of Health Services, Muscat, Oman. famco2006@gmail.com
Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Al Hasni AA, Al Jaafari M, Al Jabri R. Primary care gaps in pediatric urinary tract infection management: Knowledge, attitudes, and reported practices among general practitioners in Muscat, Oman, and potential implications for renal outcomes. World Adv Renal Med. doi: 10.25259/WARM_11_2026

Abstract

Objectives:

To evaluate general practitioners’ (GPs’) self-reported knowledge and attitudes towards paediatric urinary tract infection (UTI) management in primary healthcare center (PHCs) in Muscat, Oman, with emphasis on potential implications for kidney outcomes and referral pathways.

Material and Methods:

A multi-center, cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted across all 30 PHCs in Muscat Governorate (July 2022–February 2023). This study adhered to the Strengthening of the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines for cross-sectional studies. A validated 29-item questionnaire (Content validity ratio 0.78–1.0; Cronbach’s α = 0.80), based on Royal Hospital and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines, was administered to 227 GPs (response rate: 90.4%). Descriptive statistics summarized self-reported knowledge, attitudes, and stated referral practices.

Results:

Most GPs correctly identified key UTI symptoms in infants <3 months (e.g., unexplained fever ≥38°C: 99.0%). However, critical gaps were identified: only 7.5% recognized age <3 months as an indication for urgent specialist referral – contrary to guidelines emphasizing sepsis and kidney injury risk in this group. Amoxicillin (82.1%) and co-amoxiclav (58.1%) were most frequently reported as preferred, while first-line agents for uncomplicated UTI (trimethoprim and nitrofurantoin) were reported as avoided by >59%. Over half (59.8%) incorrectly believed a 3-day antibiotic course suffices for lower UTI. Recognition of risk factors for kidney complications (e.g., constipation and spinal lesions) was suboptimal (73–75%).

Conclusion:

While GPs demonstrated adequate self-reported recognition of pediatric UTI symptoms, significant gaps persist in stated referral criteria, antibiotic stewardship preferences, and risk factor awareness, which may contribute to delayed diagnosis, antimicrobial resistance, and theoretical implications for kidney health. These findings underscore the need for targeted continuing medical education and development of a standardized national PHC guideline aligned with nephrology best practices to support kidney-protective care.

Keywords

Antimicrobial stewardship
Kidney outcomes
Pediatric urinary tract infection
Primary care
Referral patterns

INTRODUCTION

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a frequent presentation in pediatric primary care and a significant precursor to kidney morbidity if mismanaged.[1-5] While often self-limiting, UTIs in young children – particularly infants <3 months – carry a high risk of urosepsis and acute pyelonephritis, which can lead to permanent kidney scarring, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in adulthood.[6-8] Escherichia coli accounts for ~81% of isolates, with rising antimicrobial resistance noted regionally, complicating empirical treatment and increasing the risk of treatment failure.[2,3,9]

Diagnosis relies on clinical suspicion confirmed by urine culture. Sample collection in non-toilet-trained children remains challenging; while suprapubic aspiration remains the diagnostic gold standard for non-toilet-trained children, catheterization is the recommended pragmatic alternative in primary care when suprapubic aspiration is not feasible.[8,10-14] Management depends on age, severity, and risk factors. International guidelines, such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), recommend immediate antibiotics and specialist referral for infants <3 months to mitigate kidney injury risk, alongside selective imaging (e.g., kidney ultrasound) for 1st-time febrile UTI.[15-17]

In Oman, general practitioners (GPs) serve as the gatekeepers for pediatric UTI. Delayed referral or inappropriate antibiotic selection at this level may directly increase the burden on nephrology services through preventable complications. While two national studies have explored antimicrobial resistance patterns,[2,15] none have evaluated GP competency in primary care regarding kidney-protective practices. With rising antimicrobial resistance and calls to strengthen primary healthcare centers (PHC) capacity under Oman Vision 2040,[18] this gap is critical for kidney health outcomes.

This study aimed to assess GPs’ self-reported knowledge, attitudes, and stated management preferences regarding pediatric UTI diagnosis, antibiotic selection, and referral practices in Muscat’s PHCs. By identifying specific deficits in reported referral and stewardship, the findings provide evidence to inform national guideline development that aligns primary care practices with nephrology standards to potentially prevent long-term kidney sequelae.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study design and setting

A multi-center, cross-sectional study was conducted across all 30 PHCs in Muscat Governorate, Sultanate of Oman, between July 2022 and February 2023. Muscat is the capital governorate, serving a population of approximately 1.5 million, with PHCs providing first-contact care for pediatric patients.

Participants and sampling

All 251 GPs employed in Muscat PHCs during the study period were invited to participate. Inclusion criteria were: (1) Currently practicing as a GP in a Muscat PHC, (2) providing direct clinical care to pediatric patients, and (3) willing to provide verbal informed consent. There were no exclusion criteria. A census sampling approach was used to maximize representativeness.

Questionnaire development and validation

A 29-item, English-language, self-administered questionnaire was developed by the research team based on: (1) The Royal Hospital (Muscat) pediatric UTI clinical protocol (2019), (2) the UK NICE guideline CG54 (2018 update),[11] and (3) the Oman National Formulary (2022) recommendations for empirical pediatric UTI therapy. Antibiotic choice items were aligned with first-line agents for uncomplicated lower UTI in children >3 months per these guidelines: Trimethoprim or nitrofurantoin, unless contraindicated or local resistance exceeds 20%.

The instrument comprised three sections:

  • Section 1: Sociodemographics and clinical experience (age, sex, years of practice, pediatric training, weekly pediatric caseload).

  • Section 2: Knowledge assessment (symptoms/signs by age group, risk factors for kidney complications, sample collection methods, empirical antibiotic selection, referral indications) using multiple-choice questions, Likert scales, and open-ended items.

  • Section 3: Attitudes toward UTI diagnosis and management (5-point and 3-point Likert scales, yes/no items).

Validation occurred in three phases:

  1. Content validity: Nine specialists (3 pediatric nephrologists, 6 family medicine consultants) rated each item for necessity using a 3-point scale. Content validity ratios (CVR) ranged from 0.78 to 1.00, exceeding the minimum threshold of 0.78 for n = 9 experts (Lawshe, 1975) [Supplementary Table S1].

  2. Face validity: The draft questionnaire was reviewed by five GPs not included in the final sample; no ambiguities were reported.

  3. Pilot testing: Twenty-five GPs (10% of the target sample) completed the instrument. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach’s α = 0.80).

Additional methodological details

Correct responses for knowledge items were determined based on the Royal Hospital Pediatric UTI protocol (2019) and NICE CG54 (2018 update); an answer key is available from the corresponding author. For items allowing multiple responses (e.g., referral indications in Table 1), participants could select all applicable options; percentages reflect the proportion of respondents selecting each option. Likert-scale responses were grouped as follows: “Agree” = responses 4–5 on a 5-point scale; “Disagree” = responses 1–2; “Neutral/No opinion” = response 3. No composite knowledge score was calculated due to heterogeneous item types (multiple-choice, Likert, open-ended); descriptive frequencies are reported per item to preserve interpretability. Open-ended items were thematically reviewed but not quantitatively analyzed, as they were exploratory and yielded limited additional insight beyond the structured items. The full questionnaire is provided as Supplementary File 1 to enhance transparency and reproducibility.

Table 1: Indications for specialist referral in pediatric UTI as identified by general practitioners (n=227).
Multiple responses permitted; percentages reflect the proportion of 227 general practitioners selecting each indication
Indication n (%)
Recurrent UTI 169 (74.4)
Failure of treatment 102 (44.9)
Complicated UTI 48 (21.1)
Age <3 months 17 (7.5)
Not specified/No response 26 (11.5)

UTI: Urinary tract infection. Data represent self-reported responses; actual clinical practice was not audited or verified against patient records. Denominators vary by item due to missing responses; percentages are calculated based on the number of respondents per item

Data collection

Questionnaires were distributed electronically through secure Ministry of Health email lists and in-person during PHC visits. A 2-week reminder protocol was implemented to optimize response rates. Completed questionnaires were anonymized before data entry.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was granted by the Medical Research Ethics Committee, Ministry of Health, Sultanate of Oman (Ref: MH/DGHS/DPT/154/2021). Verbal informed consent was obtained from all participants after distribution of a participant information sheet. Anonymity and confidentiality were maintained throughout; participation was voluntary, with no penalty for withdrawal. The study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki principles.

Data analysis

Data were entered and analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, means ± standard deviation) summarized participant characteristics, knowledge scores, and attitude responses. All knowledge, attitude, and management data reflect participants’ self-reported responses and stated preferences. These may not correspond to observed clinical behavior, prescription records, or audited referral practices. No inferential statistical testing was performed, as this was an exploratory descriptive study. Exploratory subgroup analyses examining associations between GP characteristics (years of experience, pediatric training, weekly pediatric caseload) and key outcomes (recognition of referral criteria, antibiotic selection preferences) were conducted; no statistically significant associations were found (Chi-square tests, p > 0.05). Given the descriptive design and limited power for subgroup inference, these results are not reported to avoid over-interpretation. Missing data were minimal (<5%/item) and handled using list-wise deletion for each analysis.

Reporting guidelines

This study adheres to the Strengthening of the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines for cross-sectional studies [Supplementary File 2: STROBE Checklist].

RESULTS

Sociodemographic characteristics

A total of 227 GPs participated out of 251 invited, yielding a response rate of 90.4%. Participants represented all 30 PHCs in Muscat Governorate. The majority were female (88.3%), with a mean age of 36.0 ± 6.9 years. Most were married (85.5%) and had children (76.8%). Regarding clinical experience, 18.5% had <5 years, 42.8% had 5–10 years, and 38.7% had >10 years of practice. Over half (55.3%) had prior pediatric placement during training, and 23.2% had attended both workshops and placements. Most participants (78.3%) managed >10 pediatric cases weekly [Table 2].

Table 2: Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of participating general practitioners (n=227).
Characteristic Category n (%)
Sex Female 200 (88.3)
Male 27 (11.7)
Age (years), mean±SD 36.0±6.9
Marital status Married 194 (85.5)
Single/Other 33 (14.5)
Has children Yes 174 (76.8)
No 53 (23.2)
Years of clinical practice <5 years 42 (18.5)
5–10 years 97 (42.8)
>10 years 88 (38.7)
Prior pediatric training Workshop only 49 (21.6)
Placement only 78 (34.4)
Both workshop and placement 53 (23.2)
None 47 (20.8)
Weekly pediatric case-load ≤10 cases 49 (21.7)
>10 cases 178 (78.3)
PHC representation All 30 PHCs in Muscat Governorate 227 (100)

Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding. PHC: Primary healthcare center, SD: Standard deviation. Data based on 227 responding GPs out of 251 invited (response rate: 90.4%). Denominators vary by item due to missing responses; percentages are calculated based on the number of respondents per item

Self-reported knowledge of symptoms and signs

Recognition of key UTI symptoms was generally high. In infants <3 months, 99.0% correctly identified unexplained fever ≥38°C as a key indicator. High recognition rates were also noted for vomiting (91.0%), lethargy/irritability (96.8%), and foul-smelling urine (99.6%). In children >3 months, frequency (91.0%), hematuria (96.0%), and failure to thrive (94.2%) were well recognized. However, non-specific symptoms such as poor feeding and abdominal pain were less consistently identified across age groups [Tables 3a and b].

Table 3a: General practitioners’ self-reported recognition of symptoms and signs of pediatric UTI in infants <3 months (n=227).
Symptom/Sign Agree, n (%) No opinion, n (%) Disagree, n (%)
Fever (≥38°C) 225 (99.0) 0 2 (0.9)
Vomiting 202 (91.0) 16 (7.2) 4 (1.8)
Lethargy/Irritability 214 (96.8) 5 (2.2) 2 (0.9)
Poor feeding 164 (75.5) 50 (23.4) 4 (1.8)a
Failure to thrive 164 (75.8) 23 (10.6) 30 (12.9)
Abdominal pain 57 (26.6) 61 (28.5) 96 (44.9)
Jaundice 184 (82.9) 23 (10.4) 15 (6.8)
Hematuria 207 (92.9) 10 (4.5) 6 (2.9)
Foul-smelling urine 226 (99.6) 1 (0.4)

Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding. Dash (–) indicates item not applicable. Disagree percentage adjusted for rounding consistency. UTI: Urinary tract infection. Data represent self-reported responses; actual clinical practice was not audited or verified against patient records. Denominators vary by item due to missing responses; percentages are calculated based on the number of respondents per item

Table 3b: General practitioners’ self-reported recognition of symptoms and signs of pediatric UTI in children >3 months (n=227).
Symptom/Sign Agree, n (%) No opinion, n (%) Disagree, n (%)
Fever (≥38°C) 203 (91.0) 17 (7.6) 3 (1.4)
Vomiting 191 (88.0) 17 (7.8) 9 (4.2)
Lethargy/Irritability 197 (88.7) 13 (5.7) 11 (5.4)
Poor feeding 109 (50.7) 52 (24.2) 54 (25.1)
Failure to thrive 210 (94.2) 8 (3.6) 5 (2.2)
Abdominal pain 42 (19.8) 79 (37.3) 91 (42.9)
Jaundice 186 (84.9) 22 (10.1) 9 (5.0)
Hematuria 214 (96.0) 7 (3.1) 2 (0.9)
Dysuria 171 (80.0) 30 (14.0) 13 (6.1)
Malaise 175 (81.0) 28 (13.0) 13 (6.0)
Frequency 203 (91.0) 14 (6.3) 6 (2.7)

Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding. Dash (–) indicates item not applicable. Disagree percentage adjusted for rounding consistency. UTI: Urinary tract infection. Data represent self-reported responses; actual clinical practice was not audited or verified against patient records. Denominators vary by item due to missing responses; percentages are calculated based on the number of respondents per item

Recognition of risk factors

Participants demonstrated strong agreement on classic risk factors, including previous UTI (95.2%), poor urine flow (92.9%), and antenatal kidney abnormality (90.8%). However, gaps were observed in recognizing factors associated with long-term kidney complications: only 74.9% agreed on constipation, 82.8% on family history of vesico-ureteric reflux, and 73.1% on evidence of spinal lesions [Table 4].

Table 4: General practitioners’ self-reported recognition of risk factors for pediatric UTI (n=227).
Risk factor Agree, n (%) No opinion, n (%) Disagree, n (%)
Constipation 170 (74.9) 30 (13.2) 24 (10.6)
Poor urine flow 211 (92.9) 7 (3.1) 4 (1.8)
Dysfunctional voiding 214 (94.3) 7 (3.1) 3 (1.3)
Family history of VUR/kidney disease 188 (82.8) 27 (11.9) 11 (4.8)
Previous UTI 216 (95.2) 4 (1.8) 5 (2.2)
Recurrent fever of unknown origin 191 (84.2) 22 (9.7) 10 (4.4)
Antenatal diagnosis of kidney abnormality 206 (90.8) 15 (6.6) 5 (2.2)
Evidence of spinal lesion 166 (73.1) 48 (21.1) 12 (5.3)

VUR: Vesico-ureteric reflux, UTI: Urinary tract infection. Data represent self-reported responses; actual clinical practice was not audited or verified against patient records. Denominators vary by item due to missing responses; percentages are calculated based on the number of respondents per item.

Investigations and management

For toilet-trained children, 94.7% correctly identified clean-catch urine as the optimal sample collection method. However, for non-toilet-trained children, only 11.9% selected catheterization (recommended pragmatic alternative); 72.0% preferred clean-catch, and 16.6% used urine bags, which have low specificity.

Regarding empirical management for a positive dipstick (leukocytes+, nitrites−), 56.7% correctly initiated antibiotics and sent a culture. Antibiotic selection patterns revealed a preference for broad-spectrum agents: Amoxicillin (82.1% reported as frequently used) and co-amoxiclav (58.1%) were most common. First-line agents for uncomplicated UTI, such as Trimethoprim and Nitrofurantoin, were reported as avoided by 61.4% and 59.4% of participants, respectively ([Table 5]; clinical scenario: empirical treatment for uncomplicated lower UTI in toilet-trained child >3 months).

Table 5: Frequency of Self-reported antibiotic use in pediatric UTI management (n=227).
Clinical scenario: Empirical treatment for an uncomplicated lower UTI in toilet-trained child >3 months
Antibiotic Never, n (%) Sometimes, n (%) Frequently, n (%) Respondents (n)
Amoxicillin 6 (2.9) 31 (15.0) 170 (82.1) 227
Co-amoxiclav (amoxicillin-clavulanate) 15 (8.4) 60 (33.5) 104 (58.1) 227
Cefalexin 28 (18.9) 87 (58.8) 33 (22.3) 227
Cefuroxime 42 (29.0) 77 (53.1) 26 (17.9) 227
Trimethoprim 89 (61.4) 38 (26.2) 18 (12.4) 145
Nitrofurantoin 85 (59.4) 45 (31.5) 13 (9.1) 143

Percentages based on respondents who answered each item (n varies slightly due to missing data). UTI: Urinary tract infection. Data represent self-reported responses; actual clinical practice was not audited or verified against patient records. Denominators vary by item due to missing responses; percentages calculated based on respondents per item

Referral practices

Recognition of standard referral indications varied: recurrent UTI (74.4%), treatment failure (44.9%), and complicated UTI (21.1%). Critically, only 7.5% identified age <3 months as an indication for urgent specialist referral, despite guidelines emphasizing sepsis and kidney injury risk in this cohort ([Table 1]; multiple responses permitted; percentages reflect proportion of 227 GPs selecting each indication).

Attitudes

Regarding attitudes toward management, 66.9% agreed that UTI is difficult to diagnose in children <2–3 years. While 83.0% believed oral antibiotics suffice for most cases, 59.8% incorrectly believed a 3-day antibiotic course suffices for lower UTI.[19,20] Conversely, 64.5% correctly acknowledged the need for imaging post-febrile UTI.

DISCUSSION

This is the first study in Oman to evaluate GPs’ self-reported knowledge and attitudes toward pediatric UTI in primary care with specific relevance to potential kidney outcomes. Overall, GPs demonstrated sound recognition of core symptoms – likely reflecting clinical experience (81.5% >5 years’ practice) and exposure to pediatric cases (78.3% >10/week). Similar findings were reported in Iran and Bahrain.[21,22] However, significant gaps persist that may have implications for nephrology services.

Referral criteria and kidney risk

Only 7.5% identified age <3 months as an indication for urgent referral – contrary to NICE and Royal Hospital guidelines recommending urgent specialist evaluation for infants <3 months due to sepsis and kidney injury risk.[11,15] This hesitancy may stem from a lack of national PHC protocols or fear of referral rejection.[4,23] From a nephrology perspective, delayed referral in this vulnerable group may theoretically increase the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) and permanent kidney scarring based on established pathophysiological pathways,[11,15] though this study did not directly measure kidney outcomes. Such delays could potentially contribute to increased tertiary care burden.

Antibiotic stewardship

The underuse of trimethoprim and nitrofurantoin (reported as avoided by >59%) in favor of broad-spectrum agents like amoxicillin/co-amoxiclav may reflect formulary limitations or knowledge gaps.[2,24] The observed preference for amoxicillin/ co-amoxiclav over guideline-recommended narrow-spectrum agents may reflect local formulary availability, perceived resistance patterns, or habitual prescribing. Recent Omani surveillance data indicate Escherichia coli resistance to amoxicillin exceeds 60% in pediatric UTI isolates,[2,9,25] underscoring the importance of stewardship-aligned prescribing. Inappropriate empirical therapy could increase the risk of treatment failure and recurrent pyelonephritis, which are primary drivers of kidney scarring. Furthermore, overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics may contribute to regional resistance patterns, limiting future therapeutic options for complicated kidney infections.

Risk factor recognition

Constipation and neurological conditions (e.g., spinal lesions) were under-recognized (73–75%). These are critical risk factors for underlying uropathy and recurrent UTI.[26,27] Failure to identify these conditions at the primary care level may delay diagnostic imaging and urological intervention, potentially permitting ongoing kidney damage.

Strengths and limitations

Strengths include robust instrument validation (CVR, pilot α), high response rate (90.4%), and focus on PHC – Oman’s frontline care tier. Limitations include: (1) Self-report bias, as GPs may have overestimated guideline adherence or underreported uncertain practices; (2) social desirability bias, wherein participants may have provided responses perceived as professionally appropriate; (3) lack of direct observation, as findings reflect stated preferences rather than audited clinical behavior or prescription records; (4) limited generalizability, as results pertain to Muscat PHCs and practices in rural governorates may differ; (5) absence of patient-level kidney outcome data, as no kidney scarring, AKI, CKD, referral timelines, or imaging results were measured – implications for kidney health are inferred from guideline frameworks and should not be interpreted as observed associations; and (6) cross-sectional design, which precludes assessment of temporal changes or causal inference.

Implications for nephrology

These findings support the development of a national PHC guideline for pediatric UTI, aligned with MoH priorities for antimicrobial stewardship and PHC strengthening.[18] Integration into CME programs and undergraduate curricula is essential. Establishing clear referral pathways between PHC and nephrology/urology services may help ensure timely intervention for high-risk children, potentially supporting kidney function preservation and reducing the long-term burden of CKD in Oman.

CONCLUSION

GPs in Muscat demonstrate competent self-reported knowledge of UTI symptoms but exhibit critical gaps in stated referral criteria, risk factor awareness, and antibiotic stewardship preferences. The low recognition of age <3 months as an urgent referral criterion and the underuse of narrow-spectrum antibiotics may pose risks for delayed diagnosis, antimicrobial resistance, and theoretical implications for kidney health. These findings underscore the need for targeted continuing medical education and the development of a standardized, evidence-based national PHC guideline aligned with nephrology best practices. Implementing clear referral pathways may help support kidney-protective care, reduce tertiary care burden, and improve long-term pediatric kidney outcomes in Oman.

Author contribution:

AAA: Conceptualization, methodology, validation, supervision, project administration, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing; MA: Conceptualization, investigation, formal analysis, data curation, writing – review and editing. RA: Investigation, data collection, formal analysis, writing – review and editing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethical approval:

The research/study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at MOHCSR, number MH/DGHS/ DPT/154/2021, dated 13th September, 2021.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Does this child have a urinary tract infection? JAMA. 2007;298:2895-07.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Antimicrobial resistance patterns of urinary tract infections in children at a tertiary care hospital in Oman. Oman Med J. 2020;35:e123.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. . Urinary tract infection: Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of the initial UTI in febrile infants and children 2 to 24 months. Pediatrics. 2011;128:595-610.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Symptoms of urinary tract infection in children. Pediatrics. 1985;76:933-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Prevalence of urinary tract infection in febrile infants. J Pediatr. 1993;123:17-23.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Incidence rate of first-time symptomatic urinary tract infection in children under 6 years of age. Acta Paediatr. 1998;87:549-52.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Association between urinary symptoms at 7 years old and previous urinary tract infection. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66:232-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. . Urinary tract infection: Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of the initial UTI in febrile infants and children 2 to 24 months. Pediatrics. 2016;138:e20162344.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , . Antimicrobial resistance in Oman: Status and challenges. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2019;19:e1-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Outcomes of blood and urine testing for urinary tract infection in febrile infants. Pediatrics. 2004;114:e163-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. . Urinary Tract Infection in Under 16s: Diagnosis and Management In: Clinical Guideline [CG54]. London: NICE; .
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , . Screening tests for urinary tract infection in children: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 1999;104:e54.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Urine collection methods in the febrile child. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2003;19:353-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , . A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials comparing midstream clean-catch vs. catheterized urine collection in children. Pediatrics. 2002;110:731-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , Oman. Royal Hospital Clinical Protocol: Paediatric Urinary Tract Infection Muscat: MOH; .
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , . Systematic review: Diagnosis and management of UTI in children 2-24 months. Pediatrics. 2011;128:e756-60.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . Diagnosis and management of pediatric urinary tract infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18:417-22.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. . Oman Vision 2040. Muscat: Supreme Council for Planning; 2020 Available from: https://vision2040.gov.om/ [Last accessed on 2025 Jan 01]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , . Does antibiotic treatment duration affect the outcomes of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in children? Pediatrics. 2011;128:e756-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , . Short versus standard duration oral antibiotic therapy for acute urinary tract infection in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;1:CD003966.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , . Knowledge and practice of general practitioners regarding urinary tract infection in children. Iran J Pediatr. 2013;23:423-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , . Knowledge and practice of Bahraini primary care physicians regarding urinary tract infection in children. J Family Community Med. 2015;22:98-104.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , . Barriers to referral in primary care in Oman. Oman Med J. 2018;33:320-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , . Treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis with nitrofurantoin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:27-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , . Prior antibiotic treatment and urine culture results in children with urinary tract infection. Pediatrics. 2006;118:2340-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , . Recurrent urinary tract infections in young children. Pediatrics. 1980;65:1083-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , . Clinical significance of primary vesicoureteral reflux and urinary antibiotic prophylaxis after acute pyelonephritis: A multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Pediatrics. 2006;117:626-32.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections